In search of everything from cost savings to faster releases and more innovation, modern enterprise software shops are busy working to migrate their on-premise applications and other workloads to the public cloud. From the New Relic blog to Amazon Web Services and beyond, many experts are doing their best to help in this epic movement.
Amidst all the excitement, though, it’s easy for essential points to get lost, so we asked New Relic’s cloud experts (from product folks to cloud evangelists) for their thoughts on the overlooked essentials of an enterprise cloud migration. Here are their insights:
1. Cloud migration is easy; digital transformation is hard
At the most basic level, cloud migration is all about getting things out of bare-metal virtual machines and into cloud instances. There may be some immediate cost benefits to that, but the realjourney toward modern software efficiency doesn’t even begin until you get to the cloud. The real goal is to adopt cloud services to speed development, enable teams to manage infrastructure more autonomously, and ultimately improve your customer experience. Early, comprehensive monitoring is essential to that digital transformation, which is when you actually reap the full benefits of moving to the cloud.
2. Cloud migration is also cultural move
For many companies, a successful cloud migration requires a cultural shift even more profound than the technology changes. If after your migration you’re still doing your same dev methology, but just doing it “in the cloud,” you aren’t going to get the great leaps in productivity you’re looking for. According to AWS principal John Enoch, as quoted in Forbes, “those organizations that have a business plan and can communicate together as teams get really good results and those that can’t don’t.”
3. Cloud and DevOps, or the chicken and the egg
One of the most common reasons why companies move to the cloud is to help implement DevOps practices. And one of the most common reasons why companies implement DevOps practices is to help them move to the cloud. Chicken, meet egg. Or maybe, chocolate, meet peanut butter.
4. Speed vs. stability can be a complicated equation
One of the cloud’s big advantages is the opportunity it offers to provision resources faster and more dynamically to meet real-time demands. That can help save money on unused infrastructure and alleviate the short-term pain of frustrated developers waiting for servers. Properly managed, smaller, less comprehensive, more frequent deploys can actually be more stable. But a cascade of poorly managed deploys with short lead times can result in chaos. Companies need to institute processes to manage and optimize the tension between speed and stability in cloud environments. That means ensuring parity between staging and production environments, properly validating all changes, incorporating modern deployment approaches such as blue/green and canary deployments, and—of course—advanced monitoring techniques.
5. Code-level visibility is essential to monitoring cloud applications
When selecting a vendor to help you monitor cloud applications, you have to ensure it offers code-level visibility. Why? Because public cloud vendors are driving customers to embed “infrastructure as code” into their applications. So deep visibility into applications is becoming a critical component of understanding infrastructure health and cost. Infrastructure metrics alone are critical, but not enough for the future.
6. You need to understand the six Rs of cloud migration
How do you decide whether to lift-and-shift an application into the cloud, or refactor it to take better advantage of capabilities available only in the cloud. The answer? It depends. Consider each of the six Rs of cloud migration strategy (rehost, replatform, repurchase, refactor, retire, and retain) on a case-by-case basis. For instance, if your team is struggling to maintain its database servers, you might want to consider refactoring to use a cloud database as a service offering. That can help reduce the need to for database server maintenance, patching, and so on.
- Refactor your applications in New Relic’s Guide to Cloud Adoption
- Six Common Application Migration Strategies (AWS)
7. There are many great cloud migration tools
Your cloud migration doesn’t have to be a blind leap. There are many tools to help you with planning, discovery, and tracking each step of your migration. Use these tools to take inventory, build a pre-migration business case, perform migration readiness, plan the actual migration of workloads and data, and validate that your migration was successful.
Don’t miss: Migration Tools—A Puzzle or Lego Blocks (AWS re:Invent 2017)
8. Consumption metrics are not enough
Many times when companies migrate applications to the cloud, they look only at infrastructure consumption metrics (CPU usage, disk I/O, etc.) but never at end-user experience metrics (response time, error rate, etc.) that show how the application is actually performing. That makes it hard to answer questions about whether the migration was “successful” or not. To truly understand the results of a migration, you mustlook at app performance in depth in addition to cloud infrastructure health.
- Monitor your cloud services and Optimize customer experience in New Relic’s Guide to Cloud Adoption
- Digital Customer Experience (DCX)—What It Means and Why It Matters
9. Proper pre-migration instrumentation can save you big $$$
For a cost-effective cloud migration, it’s critical to include instrumentation as early as possible in the process. For example, New Relic research has shown that implementing proper instrumentation before you begin your migration can save you from 16% to 25% of your total migration costs. Without pre-migration benchmarking, it’s difficult to determine operational parity post migration, so cloud migrations can end up running parallel environments far longer than expected.
Put simply, spending 48 hours instrumenting your systems before a cloud migration can save 3 months or more of migration time.
- Create application baselines and Perform migration acceptance testing in New Relic’s Guide to Cloud Adoption
- 7 Ways New Relic Can Benefit Your Bottom Line
10. CapEx vs. OpEx
An often under-appreciated element of moving from on-premise applications to cloud-based applications is not technical, but financial. The two approaches use radically different expense models. On-premise infrastructure costs are usually considered capital expenses (CapEx) while cloud service costs are typically accounted for as operating expenses (OpEx). That difference doesn’t usually affect the overall impact on the bottom line, but it can be a big deal to the CFO and the accountants who have to make the numbers come out right.
Big thanks to the experts who contributed their insights to this post: Henry Shapiro, Lee Atchison, Rob Peterson, Chhavi Nijhawan, Tori Wieldt, and Ravi Tharisayi.
The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of New Relic. Any solutions offered by the author are environment-specific and not part of the commercial solutions or support offered by New Relic. Please join us exclusively at the Explorers Hub (discuss.newrelic.com) for questions and support related to this blog post. This blog may contain links to content on third-party sites. By providing such links, New Relic does not adopt, guarantee, approve or endorse the information, views or products available on such sites.