New Relic Now Vous rêvez d'innover plus ? En octobre, faites de ce rêve une réalité.
Réservez votre place maintenant
Pour le moment, cette page n'est disponible qu'en anglais.

In this section, we explore the challenges preventing organizations from achieving full-stack observability, common pricing- and billing-related issues, and what business outcomes respondents expected if they didn’t have an observability solution.

Observability challenges highlights:

80%

experienced pricing or billing issues with an observability vendor

40%

said rapid data growth significantly impacted their observability bill

29%

anticipated higher operation costs without observability

26%

cited cost as a challenge to achieving full-stack observability

25%

noted too many tools is a barrier to achieving full-stack observability

Challenges preventing full-stack observability

So if full-stack observability provides so many advantages, what’s preventing organizations from achieving it? We found that:

  • About a quarter cited it as being too expensive (26%—which is 15% more than last year), lack of budget (25%), and too many monitoring tools (25%).
  • There was a 30% increase in the number of respondents who claim to have already achieved full-stack observability (from 2.7% in 2022 to 3.5% in 2023).
  • All other challenges decreased year-over-year (YoY), most notably 47% fewer who cited a lengthy sales cycle, 39% fewer who said their IT performance is adequate, and 35% fewer who don’t see the value in prioritizing right now.

In addition, of those who said that their IT performance is adequate (no need to improve current performance), 57% said that they spend $500,000 or more on observability per year.

These results suggest a number of different hurdles and pain points when it comes to achieving full-stack observability. Cost was the primary barrier this year, while lack of understanding of the benefits of observability and thinking their IT performance was adequate were primary barriers in 2022.
However, the decrease for most challenges indicates a trend toward more organizations seeing the business value of observability and monitoring their full tech stack.
26%

said cost is a barrier to achieving full-stack observability

Role insight
Non-executive managers were more likely to cite a lack of budget (34%) than executives (22%) and practitioners (25%).

Organization size insight
Small and midsize organizations saw cost and lack of budget and personnel as bigger barriers to full-stack observability, while large organizations struggled more with too many monitoring tools and siloed data.

Primary challenges preventing the achievement of full-stack observability in 2023 vs 2022 (note that the 2022 question allowed up to five selections while 2023 allowed up to three)

It’s challenging that observability is so expensive. That often becomes a barrier. Whether you’re really small or you have a whole lot of money, cost really gets prohibitive once you get above a certain threshold.

Pricing- and billing-related observability issues

Since cost is so often cited as a barrier to observability, we looked at what pricing- and billing-related issues organizations have experienced with their observability vendor(s) in the past year. We found that:

  • Two in five (40%) said rapid data growth significantly impacted their observability bill.
  • About a third had to pay for the whole month or year at their peak usage level (33%) and/or pay for unwanted bundles to get the observability capabilities they need (32%).
  • Three in 10 (30%) dealt with frequent re-forecasting and re-contracting for multiple SKUs
  • Nearly a quarter (23%) experienced unbudgeted monthly overage fees and penalties.
  • Just 15% indicated no pricing- or billing-related issues with their observability vendor(s).

Notably, at least 80% of respondents experienced pricing or billing issues with an observability vendor in 2022.

These results indicate that pricing and billing can be a challenge to adopting and maintaining an observability practice. Organizations should be aware of and avoid common pricing traps when comparing or evaluating observability vendors to realize the most value from their observability investment.
40%

said rapid data growth significantly impacted their observability bill

Regional insight
Generally, Asia Pacific was more likely to experience pricing- and billing-related issues than Europe or North America.

Organization size insight
Generally, large organizations were the most likely to experience pricing- and billing-related issues, followed by midsize and then small organizations.

Pricing- or billing-related issues experienced with observability vendor(s) in the past year

Business outcomes without observability

We were interested in what would be the most significant business outcome if an organization did not have an observability solution.

Survey respondents indicated that higher operation costs due to increased operational effort would be the most significant business outcome (29%), followed by revenue loss due to increased downtime (23%). These were also the most concrete financial impacts—higher costs and lost revenue—while other reasons were about reputation loss (17%), reduced team velocity (14%), and competitive disadvantage (12%). Just 3% said not having an observability solution would not affect business outcomes.

So, 96% indicated that they would experience a significant business outcome if their organization didn’t have an observability solution.

These results mean respondents very much see hard financial stakes attached to observability. In particular, they anticipated higher operation costs and revenue loss from downtime as the concrete financial impacts of not having observability.
29%

anticipated higher operation costs without observability

Industry insight
Those from the government were the most likely to say not having an observability solution would result in higher operation costs due to increased operational effort (40%), followed by retail/consumer (34%).

Most significant business outcome without an observability solution