New Relic Now Sonha com inovar mais? Viva esse sonho em outubro.
Reserve já
No momento, esta página está disponível apenas em inglês.

Here we take a closer look at the differences in survey responses by region.

  Asia Pacific Europe North America
 Current deployment Asia PacificMore likely to have 10+ capabilities deployed and most likely to have achieved full-stack observability and have a mature observability practice EuropeLeast likely to have 10+ capabilities deployed, to have achieved full-stack observability, and have a mature observability practice, but most likely to capture telemetry across the full tech stack North AmericaMore likely to have 10+ capabilities deployed, but least likely to plan to deploy at least one capability next year
 Number of monitoring tools Asia PacificMost likely to prefer multiple point solutions, use 5+ tools, and say too many monitoring tools is a challenge, but least likely to plan to consolidate tools next year EuropeMore likely to prefer a single, consolidated platform and plan to consolidate tools next year North AmericaMore likely to prefer a single, consolidated platform and most likely to use a single observability platform, use fewer tools in general, and plan to consolidate tools next year
 Telemetry data Asia PacificMost likely to have more unified telemetry data and to say users broadly have access to telemetry data and visualizations EuropeMore likely to have more siloed telemetry data, but most likely to say telemetry is unified in a single pane for consumption across teams North AmericaMore likely to have more siloed telemetry data and say that siloed data is a challenge, and least likely to say telemetry is unified in a single pane for consumption across teams and that users broadly have access to telemetry data and visualizations
 Strategy Asia PacificMost likely to view observability as more of a key enabler for achieving core business goals EuropeMost likely to view observability as equally for core business goals and incident response/insurance North AmericaMost likely to view observability as more for incident response/insurance
 Detecting outages Asia PacificMost likely to learn about software and system interruptions primarily with manual checks/tests, complaints, or incident tickets EuropeMost likely to learn about software and system interruptions primarily with one observability platform North AmericaMost likely to learn about software and system interruptions primarily with multiple monitoring tools
 Service-level metrics for high-business-impact outages Asia PacificMost frequent outages and slowest MTTD and MTTR EuropeFastest MTTR North AmericaLeast frequent outages and fastest MTTD
 Median annual outage cost Asia Pacific$19.07M Europe$8.42M North America$1.2M
 Annual observability spend and value received Asia PacificMost likely to spend at least $500K and say they receive $500K–$5M in total value EuropeMore likely to spend at least $100K and most likely to say they receive $5M or more in total value North AmericaMost likely to spend less than $100K and to say they receive less than $500K in total value
 Median annual ROI Asia Pacific114% Europe100% North America100%
 Top 2 value maximization plans for next year Asia PacificTraining staff on how to best use the observability tools they have and optimizing engineering team size EuropeTraining staff on how to best use the observability tools they have and consolidating tools North AmericaConsolidating tools and training staff on how to best use the observability tools they have
 Top 2 drivers of observability Asia PacificAdoption of AI technologies like GPT and increased focus on security, governance, risk, and compliance (tied) EuropeIncreased focus on security, governance, risk, and compliance and integration of business apps like ERP and CRM into workflows North AmericaIncreased focus on security, governance, risk, and compliance and development of cloud-native application architectures
 Top 2 barriers to achieving full-stack observability Asia PacificToo expensive and too many monitoring tools EuropeToo many monitoring tools and too expensive North AmericaLack of budget and too expensive